Nikas Culinaria

RSS Feed

eat with your eyes

Essentialism and Authenticity in Food: Molecular Pablum

September 5th, 2007 · 6 Comments

flask

(Erlenmeyer flasks from the Argonne National Laboratory glass blowing shop. source)

Today’s article, “The Essence of Nearly Anything, Drop by Limpid Drop“, by Harold McGee in The New York Times, has me thinking on what what we might call “real food“, authenticity, essentialism, and molecular gastronomy.

You likely know that Harold McGee is a food science writer who’s book “On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen” is a core primer on food science for non-food scientists.

In this article, McGee talks about a “new” method of making flavored liquids or essences by a “gelatin clarification” method.

The basic overview of this method is this:

  • Prepare a liquid from desired food (lobster, peaches, carrots, spirulina, chicken, hog toenails, whale mesentary, simply anything at all)
  • If the liquid was made without bones or some cartilage, add a small amount of gelatin, dissolve
  • Freeze preparation
  • Place frozen block in strainer (with cheese cloth?) in bowl in the fridge
  • Allow ice crystals to slowly melt over days and release into bowl (be sure to seal up this assembly otherwise it will pick up other odors in the fridge)
  • Use what drips from the matrix (gelatin, fats, proteins, etc) as an essence.

What is happening here is that the gelatin forms a matrix or net into which everything is bound. As is the wont with all things fluidic, upon freezing, the water portion of the fluid is excluded from the gelatin matrix as it freezes into crystals, leaving behind particulate matter. Water soluble components travel with the water.

When the frozen block is slowly thawed at temps that are too low for the gelatin and fats to become fluid, the ice crystals melt and water and water soluble fractions drip away from the matrix.

The molecular gastronomists like to call this an “essence”. With this, you have purified the water soluble flavors. You have also left behind fat soluble flavors which can be extraordinary.

The “novelty” here is that the water soluble essence may deliver a different and perhaps more intense flavor because it is no longer combined with what ever flavors may have been in the fat soluble fraction.

Those fats may have served to mask, dampen or modify the water soluble flavors.

Fat and water soluble favors have become uncoupled in an “un-natural” or not naturally occurring way that will usually not be present in legacy preparations, recipes, foods, or cuisines.

These clarified essences have become faddish. (Actually, I think they were “conceived” in such a way that faddism was a foregone conclusion.)

Chefs who strive for “fame” and profit jump on the essence bandwagon and deliver victual conceits such as lamb loin flavored with pretzel elixir, a creation by Wylie Dufresne of WD-50 in NYC. I have not had this dish but I suppose I would consider trying it if I were in a “gee wiz” mood.

I think I would know I have lost my way if I had to start a $500 meal (gratuity, alcohol, parking, and bathroom usage not included) by signing a non-disclosure agreement, be frisked for a prohibited camera, and eat crappy photos of sushi printed on oddly favored “food product” paper sheets while sniffing aerosolized “ocean” and watching hypodermic needles being used to extrude lyophylized clam deoxyribonucleic acid noodles that are then infused with cotton candy essence, incubated in fluorescein dye and all the lights doused while I am spoon fed the glowing concoction while being irradiated with a UV light by an unpaid intern wearing UV safe goggles and a meat jerky flavored gel bodysuit.

fuorescein

(Fluorescein dye)

I would much prefer to try such a meal prepared by a passionate food hacker (for a modest fee and at an ad hock food hacking party - all in the spirit of fun, experimentation and “science”) than as a status meal in an expensive restaurant served with considerable self-importance.

With respect to “authentic” food and whether pretzel essence infused lamb loin is authentic in any way, I think we need to stick a definition on that word.

From Merriam-Webster Online:

“Main Entry: au·then·tic
Pronunciation: &-’then-tik, o-
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English autentik, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin authenticus, from Greek authentikos, from authentEs perpetrator, master, from aut- + -hentEs (akin to Greek anyein to accomplish, Sanskrit sanoti he gains)
1 obsolete : AUTHORITATIVE
2 a : worthy of acceptance or belief as conforming to or based on fact <paints an authentic picture of our society> b : conforming to an original so as to reproduce essential features <an authentic reproduction of a colonial farmhouse> c : made or done the same way as an original <authentic Mexican fare>
3 : not false or imitation : REAL, ACTUAL <based on authentic documents> <an authentic cockney accent>
4 a of a church mode : ranging upward from the keynote — compare PLAGAL 1 b of a cadence : progressing from the dominant chord to the tonic — compare PLAGAL 2
5 : true to one’s own personality, spirit, or character “

Authenticity is not the impetus or motivation in “gee wiz” victual conceit molecular gastronomy. Innovation may be a motivator but I think that the vagaries of ego and business capsize that noble though misplaced ambition.

No, I fear that most of the commercial molecular gastronomy pablum we are “fed” would be better defined as “derivative”:

“Main Entry: 2derivative
Function: adjective
1 : formed by derivation <a derivative word>
2 : made up of or marked by derived elements
3 : lacking originality : BANAL

I would prefer unadorned roasted marrow bones or a slice of headcheese with a side of just picked calabash tomatoes sprinkled with chunky sea salt to some expensive overwrought pseudo-imaginative and derivative essence delivered with pomp and circumstance.

yawn

(yawn)

Related posts:

Technorati Tags: The New York Times, , , , , , , On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tags:

vita mix

6 comments for this entry ↓

  • 1 Essentialism and Authenticity in Food: Molecular Pablum // Sep 5, 2007 at 11:51 am

    [...] article at Nika delivered by [...]

  • 2 Curt // Sep 5, 2007 at 1:42 pm

    After watching last year’s Top Chef, with wolfie-boy thinking he was into the latest stuff with his ever-present foams, I formed my own opinion on molecular gastronomy… I don’t want anything to do with it!

    It may be cool, and it may present new delivery of flavors, but mostly it’s for the ‘wow’ factor and the ego of the chef, in my opinion.

    Food, to me, is best when it’s low tech. Apply the right type of heat to the food, if it needs heat, make the flavors really say something.

    I work in IT; don’t put it on my plate, too!

  • 3 Nika // Sep 5, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    Curt: heh, IT on a plate - yikes! I would have to pass on that too.

    These people who are working on colorless essences or flavorants are mostly making one off artificial flavorings that many of us try to avoid these days. go figure.

  • 4 Dan Estridge // Sep 11, 2007 at 7:20 am

    I find myself in the uncomfortable position of defending molecular gastronomy. Uncomfortable because - as my blog demonstrates - I am deeply concerned with preserving culinary tradition.

    But as I think about both tradition and evolution in cooking, I find myself asking questions. Is tradition - if that means simply repeating established practice - necessarily a good thing? Are newfangled approaches - simply by virtue of their novelty - necessarily bad?

    For me, a good dish is one that successfully arranges the interaction of flavors, aromas, textures, temperatures, and appearance. Classic cuisine has had the benefit of time - or evolution - to select and perfect combinations of ingredients and techniques that succeed in this way. Molecular Gastronomy has not.

    A traditional chef who is competent to repeat classics, but lacking a deep comprehension of why things work as they do is a talented craftsman, but not an artist. Chefs like this can deliver wonderful meals as long as they stay within familiar bounds, but most often fall short when they attempt to innovate. Witness the many technically competent, but undisciplined and clueless practitioners of arbitrary fusion cuisine.

    In the realm of MolGast, a chef who creates novel - but otherwise unenlightening - combinations is a hack. But when a chef, in either realm, is an artist…

    Creative, and worthwhile, invention in the kitchen is an expression of an artistic vision. When a chef, proceeding from a deep understanding, uses MolGast to realize an otherwise impossible dish - one that expresses something compelling - they have done something great. Molecular gastronomy is important, not because of all the silly things people have done with it, but because it occasionally permits a true artist to precisely isolate the salient aspects juxtaposed in his composition.

  • 5 Nika // Sep 11, 2007 at 8:17 am

    Dan, Thank you for your very well written comment and I could not have said it any better.

    As a scientist, I am very excited to see chefs, cooks, and foodies delving into food science. I am up for the most outlandish and crazed ideas. I too feel very committed to understanding, making, documenting, and preserving legacy cuisines (Colombian, Native American, etc) and I do not feel that is threatened by MolGas experimentation.

    What I do lament is that MolGas will not live up to it’s potential and become sidetracked into elitist extraordinarily expensive venues where the science can become smoke and mirrors for the sake of being smoke and mirrors rather than a teachable moment. Hope that makes sense.

    I am also an artist so I can totally appreciate a chef’s art but I think that the enduring work manifests through a combination of legacy techniques and cuisines with a “modern” or contemporary approach to ingredients etc.

    I think the greater measure of transcendental food experiences lies in the dedication of the chef to outstanding preparation and flavor development while maintaining simplicity of ingredient.

    Alas, I have to run to an on-location shoot for the next two days so I will be out of regular touch.

    Thanks for visiting!

  • 6 Real Molecular Gastronomy: Nutrigenomics | Nikas Culinaria // Feb 29, 2008 at 8:00 am

    [...] and food photography and not even talk about molecular gastronomy as you have read me do before (Essentialism and Authenticity in Food: Molecular Pablum, Molecular Gastronomy 101: Part 2 - The Nose and receptors, Molecular Gastronomy 101: Biology [...]

Leave a Comment

  • adsadsLearn something new.  I adore this artist and her story.